Categories: NewsPolitics

BREAKING: Reps to appeal judgement on Section 84 (12)

The House of Representatives has decided to appeal the judgement of the Federal High Court sitting in Umuahia, asking the Attorney General of the Federation to delete section 84(12) from the electoral act amendment bill recently signed into law by President Muhammadu Buhari.

Members of the House expressed disappointment and displeasure with the judgement, which they said was aimed at ursurping the powers of lawmaking conferred on them by the 1999 Constitution as amended.

They also resolved to petition the National Judicial Council(NJC) about the conduct of the judge who gave judgement against the National Assembly even when they were not necessary parties to the suit.

They also asked the Attorney General of the Federation not to tamper with the law as made by the National Assembly pending the determination of all appeals related to it.

Speaker Femi Gbajabiamiala said the Executive or an appointee of the Executive cannot by the provision of the Constitution delete even a punctuation mark on any law as that would amount to usurping the powers expressly conferred on the National Assembly.

He said it was curious the judgement was given when the Plaintiff did not show any injury that he will suffer if the section is not deleted, adding that the plaintiff is neither a political appointee nor a public servant.

The House of Representatives has decided to appeal the judgement of the Federal High Court sitting in Umuahia, asking the Attorney General of the Federation to delete section 84(12) from the electoral act amendment bill recently signed into law by President Muhammadu Buhari.

Members of the House expressed disappointment and displeasure with the judgement, which they said was aimed at ursurping the powers of lawmaking conferred on them by the 1999 Constitution as amended.

They also resolved to petition the National Judicial Council(NJC) about the conduct of the judge who gave judgement against the National Assembly even when they were not necessary parties to the suit.

They also asked the Attorney General of the Federation not to tamper with the law as made by the National Assembly pending the determination of all appeals related to it.

Speaker Femi Gbajabiamiala said the Executive or an appointee of the Executive cannot by the provision of the Constitution delete even a punctuation mark on any law as that would amount to usurping the powers expressly conferred on the National Assembly.

He said it was curious the judgement was given when the Plaintiff did not show any injury that he will suffer if the section is not deleted, adding that the plaintiff is neither a political appointee nor a public servant.

thepublisherngr

Recent Posts

We Have Done Better Than Those Who Governed Rivers For Eight Years – Fubara

Governor Siminalayi Fubara of Rivers State has said his administration has performed better since assuming…

2 hours ago

Presidency Speaks On Atiku, Obi’s Planned Alliance, Discloses What Tinubu Is Concerned About

The Federal Government has dismissed the planned alliance between former Vice President Atiku Abubakar and…

2 hours ago

Usyk Defeats Fury To Become Undisputed Heavyweight Champion

Oleksandr Usyk has defeated Tyson Fury to become the undisputed heavyweight boxing champion of the…

2 hours ago

Black Market Dollar (USD) To Naira (NGN) Exchange Rate Today 19th May 2024

What is the Dollar to Naira Exchange rate at the black market also known as…

2 hours ago

Panic as miscreants beat up soldiers in Abuja market

There was pandemonium at the popular Banex area in the Wuse II district of Abuja…

2 hours ago

Minimum Wage: We Won’t Shift Ground On ₦‎615,000 Demand, Says Labour

Organised Labour, comprising the Nigeria Labour Congress and Trade Union Congress, has said it will…

2 hours ago